Regularly, there they are… those same images. Sure the faces change and occasionally, so do the names of the countries affected. But at the end of the day, it’s the same story: millions of people starving to death. As someone who has been working to alleviate poverty for years now; I can tell you that many of the root causes are the same.
This is the first time that the international community has used the term “famine” since almost a million Ethiopians died of starvation in 1984. And, as with that situation, we could see the lead-up and it was clearly predictable.
One issue is rarely discussed during the “panic stage” of the immediate crisis is bad land policy and goodness knows there is enough to talk about where that subject is concerned! With better land policy, many governments could avoid facing the cyclical problem of starvation, food aid, starvation… Instead, so many are content to defend the redistribution (forcibly) of the land of small family-owned farms giving millions of acres to foreign governments instead of investing in local farmers who will produce food not only for their own families; but for the nation at large.
The biggest losers in this continually bad decision making process are women and children. Women produce 80% to 90% of Africa’s food and that means that no one eats if African women aren’t given the tools that they need to be successful. Land is the most basic of those needs. Unfortunately, only 5% of all titled land belongs to women in Africa and the same percentage applies to women in training and extended services. So, the numbers are simply turned on their heads: 90% of food production by women; yet more than 90% of the time, they are not who governments look to help. This is bad math, plain and simple.
So, understanding that women are the backbone of domestic food production, one wonders why there is little or no technical support for these women farmers. It is even more worrisome once you learn that in places where women are targeted through even small pilot programs which encourage (and train) women to have small plots of land called “city gardens”; food production increases. This is a huge benefit for their children who then have access to more nutrition. Many of us who work in development in Africa can tell you that investing in women produces real and lasting results. It is a sad shame that so many international organizations and government don’t seem to get the point!
I’m certainly not an expert on the subject; but I think that the most important things to address if we really want to solve the problem in the long-term are these:
- Women must have independent access to land if we want to eradicate poverty. With ownership, they will gain the ability to make decisions and get loans among other things.
- Lack of human rights, women’s rights among them, is an issue that might not come to mind immediately when thinking about famine; but it is certainly a relevant topic. Consider the following:
- Currently, even amid one of the worst famines in decades, the Islamist group, Al-Shabaab of Somalia is refusing to allow food to be delivered to the starving, considering aid agencies as “infidels”. Many governmental organizations (in the U.S. and elsewhere) are concerned (legitimately, in my view)
- Flashback to the past: This problem isn’t anything new or original. Using the poor as a weapon is done more often than you may know. During the terrible famine in the Horn of Africa, the Ethiopian government refused to allow aid through to Eritrea (before Eritrea got independence.) arguing that it could fall into the hands of “the enemy”.
- Acts such as burning trees, crops, etc. in order to prevent people from supporting rebel or government forces is an all too common “weapon” used during conflicts. Act such as these can even cause or exacerbate famine, even more so if there is a drought.
- It is simply not possible to have food security without general security. How can we expect crop returns to matter in areas where people are fleeing from conflict or being chased out of their homes and villages? The lists of countries is a long one; but one need look no further than the Horn of Africa for starters. But the same has been true in many parts of the continent.
- The lack of long-term planning creates strong, powerful “aid” agencies. But, who is ultimately being aided? It seems a fair assessment to state that the creation of hundreds of high-paying jobs in the humanitarian sector is not what will aid the development of Africa and improve the lives of women or their families.
- Rural credit access must be available to women as well as training and information concerning markets, etc.
- High global food prices are making (and will continue to make) buying food aid even more difficult. We keep hearing about this; but isn’t it even more important to ask ourselves why on earth food aid is being brought in from countries like the United States when there are African countries able to export food instead? It seems like a pretty common sense solution after all: Let the women of one African nation provide food for others who need it. Even in urgent situations where food aid is needed; why aren’t international organizations supporting regional African farmers so that they can further prevent poverty for Africans?
- Development policies which consider the specific needs of women (versus men). Policies crafted around men’s needs are not always the most efficient or helpful for women; so why aren’t women being consulted at local, national and international levels when policy is being developed?
This is an old problem and we are in need of new thinking. We must stop repeating the errors of the past and expected new results. That is after all, the very definition of insanity, right?
OK, so now is the most important part: Tell me YOUR viewpoint! As I always say: “Everyone has something to add to the discussion! Let us talk, then, get to work on the long-term solutions”